Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Visit our tractor and agricultural equipment communities:
Ingersoll Forum
Case IH Forum
Combine Forum
Hay Forum
JCB Forum
John Deere Forum
Kubota Forum
Mahindra Forum
Massey Ferguson Talk
New Holland Forum
Valtra Forum
Yanmar Forum
Zetor Forum
Farming Forum
Forums
Bobcat Skidsteer Forums
Bobcat Compact Track Loaders
New track machine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support SkidSteer Forum:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="500K_773" data-source="post: 118" data-attributes="member: 33"><p>I am trying to justify the added cost of upgrading right now and can't see the return on the dollar, maybe you can tell me what I'm missing.</p><p>My 773 has a 74" bucket which holds 17.6 ft^3 of material and has a top speed of 7 MPH. The T300 with a 80" bucket holds 22.4 ft^3 or the 88" bucket holds 24.6 ft^3 of material with a top speed of 6.6 MPH. The T300 holds more material, but is a little slower.</p><p>If the machines were digging the same size hole and hauling the excavated material the same distance, the T300 has a 26% advantage with the 80" bucket or a 38% with the 88" bucket. I may be able to charge the customer more per hour for the T300, but will burn more fuel and I assume the tracks have a higher cost per hour maintenance ($/hour at replacement time) than tires; so I will call this a wash. The T300 is also over twice the price of the 773 or S185. I know the T300 can lift more than the 773, but I rarely need to lift more weight (like pallets), it would just be nice to carry more material (ie.: bigger bucket).</p><p>The T300 would have the advantage when loading trucks, because trucking time would be less due to shorter load time. But I rarely have to haul material away from the customer's site. The T300 also has more horsepower, 81 HP vs 56 HP; so it could run the High Flow option I would want, but is not a necessity at the moment. The T300 does have tracks that would greatly help in soft/muddy conditions and should have better traction when pushing material. The downside to the tracks is the rough ride over obstacles/uneven ground and I couldn't chain up like my tires in the winter.</p><p>Don't get me wrong, I would love a T300 right now, but don't know if I (for my owner/operator business) can justify the added expense right now. If you can think of some more performance benefits and cost saving, please let me know, I'd like to see what I am missing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="500K_773, post: 118, member: 33"] I am trying to justify the added cost of upgrading right now and can't see the return on the dollar, maybe you can tell me what I'm missing. My 773 has a 74” bucket which holds 17.6 ft^3 of material and has a top speed of 7 MPH. The T300 with a 80” bucket holds 22.4 ft^3 or the 88” bucket holds 24.6 ft^3 of material with a top speed of 6.6 MPH. The T300 holds more material, but is a little slower. If the machines were digging the same size hole and hauling the excavated material the same distance, the T300 has a 26% advantage with the 80“ bucket or a 38% with the 88“ bucket. I may be able to charge the customer more per hour for the T300, but will burn more fuel and I assume the tracks have a higher cost per hour maintenance ($/hour at replacement time) than tires; so I will call this a wash. The T300 is also over twice the price of the 773 or S185. I know the T300 can lift more than the 773, but I rarely need to lift more weight (like pallets), it would just be nice to carry more material (ie.: bigger bucket). The T300 would have the advantage when loading trucks, because trucking time would be less due to shorter load time. But I rarely have to haul material away from the customer's site. The T300 also has more horsepower, 81 HP vs 56 HP; so it could run the High Flow option I would want, but is not a necessity at the moment. The T300 does have tracks that would greatly help in soft/muddy conditions and should have better traction when pushing material. The downside to the tracks is the rough ride over obstacles/uneven ground and I couldn't chain up like my tires in the winter. Don't get me wrong, I would love a T300 right now, but don't know if I (for my owner/operator business) can justify the added expense right now. If you can think of some more performance benefits and cost saving, please let me know, I'd like to see what I am missing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Bobcat Skidsteer Forums
Bobcat Compact Track Loaders
New track machine
Top