Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Visit our tractor and agricultural equipment communities:
Ingersoll Forum
Case IH Forum
Combine Forum
Hay Forum
JCB Forum
John Deere Forum
Kubota Forum
Mahindra Forum
Massey Ferguson Talk
New Holland Forum
Valtra Forum
Yanmar Forum
Zetor Forum
Farming Forum
Forums
Bobcat Skidsteer Forums
Bobcat Compact Track Loaders
Biased track loader comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support SkidSteer Forum:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Farmall" data-source="post: 10648" data-attributes="member: 1308"><p>Cat/ASV's advantage is also its disadvantage. Great ride but lots of little expensive bits spinning under great tension in mud and rocks. The full report would include undercarriage rebuild costs over 5000 hours. The test is biased because any good operator would change the conditions rather than endure them. That's what the bucket is for. Smooth out the work route. Any operator who doesn't do this you wouldn't want to hire anyway. Skids are all about cycle times, and CTLs are all about cycle times, traction, and stability. Smooth work routes are something you need to create and maintain. Funny how many people don't get this. The cat vid is like the JD video where they ran three skids into a pile of dirt until all but the JD stalled. This was supposed to show JD's reserve torque. What it really showed was what are not supposed to do. Didn't prove anything. Pure advertising.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Farmall, post: 10648, member: 1308"] Cat/ASV's advantage is also its disadvantage. Great ride but lots of little expensive bits spinning under great tension in mud and rocks. The full report would include undercarriage rebuild costs over 5000 hours. The test is biased because any good operator would change the conditions rather than endure them. That's what the bucket is for. Smooth out the work route. Any operator who doesn't do this you wouldn't want to hire anyway. Skids are all about cycle times, and CTLs are all about cycle times, traction, and stability. Smooth work routes are something you need to create and maintain. Funny how many people don't get this. The cat vid is like the JD video where they ran three skids into a pile of dirt until all but the JD stalled. This was supposed to show JD's reserve torque. What it really showed was what are not supposed to do. Didn't prove anything. Pure advertising. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Bobcat Skidsteer Forums
Bobcat Compact Track Loaders
Biased track loader comparison
Top