Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="skidsteer.ca" data-source="post: 2921" data-attributes="member: 307">TazTwo hours of the blasting time was spent blowing and vaccuming most of the media out of the machine. I'm sure some will be falling out 10 years from now.The higher pressure of the second compressor has made the process a little faster. I found much under 80 psi in the blaster, was a waste of sand. At 13 cfm you would have to do alot of waiting for the comp to catch up. I forget the cfm rating on the blaster, but I feel you could safely double it to be satisfied with the performance. I have a couple of pulp trailers I'd like to do, ones 48' and the other 36'. I would not attemp a job this size with a 3mm nozzle. it is just to slow. If I decide to do this, I would be looking to rent a compreesor and a blaster with a much larger nozzle.Ken</blockquote>