No one know your needs better then you. That why cutom built equipment often works the best.
Manufacturers have to convince themselves that
1 it is feasable
2 the idea is marketable
3 their customers are all going to be willing to pay the additional expense.
If any one of these points is questionable the feature get scrapped
Where as the end user/manufacturer only has to worry #1, the rest they already know
Ken
Ken, you forgot about the lawyers...
The Lawyers must insure that the product is designed so no one will sue the manufacturer. They put themselves in the position of our parent and feel the need to protect us from harming ourselves. To them the perfect product has no moving parts, is totally inert, does nothing and can be sold for enough money to pay their salaries...
I have been around enough equipment to appreciate well designed equipment and safety systems. On a couple of occasions I have tested those safety features and were damn glad they were there. However, I understand the operation of machinery is dangerous. I fully understand the risks and am prepared to take the risk to get the benefits of their use.
Somehow society has adopted the belief that nothing is our fault. Combined with the fact that a significant portion of the population feels the only way to get ahead is to win the lottery or their pending lawsuit...
It was a low day in judicial history when that elderly lady sued McDonald's because she spilled HOT coffee in her lap, and won. We have broken Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection; in the USA the stupid are making a comeback...