Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Visit our tractor and agricultural equipment communities:
Ingersoll Forum
Case IH Forum
Combine Forum
Hay Forum
JCB Forum
John Deere Forum
Kubota Forum
Mahindra Forum
Massey Ferguson Talk
New Holland Forum
Valtra Forum
Yanmar Forum
Zetor Forum
Farming Forum
Forums
General Skidsteer & Technical Topics
Attachments
Grapple hydraulic issue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support SkidSteer Forum:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SkidRoe" data-source="post: 107407" data-attributes="member: 3290"><p>It certainly could. While the hose may be 1/4" ID, the end fittings have much smaller ID's than that. </p><p>If both hose end fittings had a 0.060" wall interior barb, which they well could, you would be reducing the flow area by a factor of 4.</p><p>In order to get laminar flow through a system, pressure lines should be sized to keep the flow speed below 15 ft/s.</p><p>If your machine produces 16 GPM, with 3/8 hose, you would get a flow speed of 8.7 ft/s, which is okay. Reduce to 1/4" hose and your flow speed goes up to 34.9 ft/s. This flow will be very turbulent and restrictive.</p><p>Also keep in mind that the flow is bidirectional, and return lines should be sized to keep the flow speed to less than 8 ft/s, to avoid cavitation.</p><p>Based on this, I would say that 3/8" hose is the minimum size that should be used, especially when you consider the area differential of the cylinder and the fact that a retracting cylinder generates a higher return flow than on extension. </p><p>FYI - The grapple on our Bobcat 773 runs 1/2" hose. </p><p>Hope this helps - SR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SkidRoe, post: 107407, member: 3290"] It certainly could. While the hose may be 1/4" ID, the end fittings have much smaller ID's than that. If both hose end fittings had a 0.060" wall interior barb, which they well could, you would be reducing the flow area by a factor of 4. In order to get laminar flow through a system, pressure lines should be sized to keep the flow speed below 15 ft/s. If your machine produces 16 GPM, with 3/8 hose, you would get a flow speed of 8.7 ft/s, which is okay. Reduce to 1/4" hose and your flow speed goes up to 34.9 ft/s. This flow will be very turbulent and restrictive. Also keep in mind that the flow is bidirectional, and return lines should be sized to keep the flow speed to less than 8 ft/s, to avoid cavitation. Based on this, I would say that 3/8" hose is the minimum size that should be used, especially when you consider the area differential of the cylinder and the fact that a retracting cylinder generates a higher return flow than on extension. FYI - The grapple on our Bobcat 773 runs 1/2" hose. Hope this helps - SR [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Skidsteer & Technical Topics
Attachments
Grapple hydraulic issue
Top