Thanks for the info so far guys. Definitely not a 600/610, it's hydrostatic and has the VH4D Wisconsin in it... I'll try to post some pictures. I'm still on the fence about it, it has apparently spun a bearing in the engine so I'd have to rebuild it... The fellow selling says it's easy to push around without the engine running, I didn't think you'd be able to push a hydro machine around easily, or are the first generation hydrostatic machines different? I know my 732 is pretty much near impossible to move without the engine running...
Ok let's see if this works... http://www.heavyequipmentforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=123515&stc=1&d=1409269969
I learned something new today. Thanks OM.
I've skimmed thru the parts diagrams for the 700 and 720 but haven't found what the difference is.
Thanks OldMachinist! I'm still undecided on it, not sure if I have the time for another project... What is the general consensus on these early hydrostatic machines? I have lots of time on a 732 both running it and tinkering on it, the pumps on this thing look quite different from the 732... The owner tells me this thing can be rolled around easily with a quad without the engine running, no way you could do that with the 732... Is this normal for this machine? Sorry about all the questions...
My 700 will roll fairly easy with the engine off, you can't use it as an anchor point. Not sure if it's just something worn excessively or if it's normal for this type. Mine also has the 8 lug axles.
